| .

Announcements
Description
Objectives
Requirements
Texts
Instructor
Calendar
Sources
Bibliography
Main
Page
|
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
Methods of Teaching
English
and the Language Arts
Graduate Student Requirements
Because this is a practical course involving
simulations, group activity, and discussion, attendance and active
participation at each meeting are essential. Requirements also include the
following:
|
Assignment |
Due Date |
- Teaching Plans (35% of grade):
|
. |
- A three-to-five-page comparison
of two plans you have found in a book or professional journal
or on the Web (10%) WTS
1, 2
- An annotated
plan* that combines literature instruction with instruction in one or more of the
following language arts: writing, language study, spoken
language, media and technogy. (10%) WTS 2, 4, 5, 7
- An annotated
plan* based on a contemporary short story for young
adults in Join In(10%) WTS 2, 4,
5, 7 (Submit final copy electronically)
- Detailed comments
on a plan written by another person in class
(5%) WTS 6, 9,
10
|
Draft Final copy Draft Final
copy |
- Demonstration of a learning
activity in class, including pre-conference and handout
(15%) WTS 4, 5
|
See Calendar |
- Participation in in-class and online reading and
discussion groups (15%) WTS 6, 10
- Brief reports on individual articles read
- Review of a book from the bibliography
- Report to class on group discussion, including
written minutes (completed in class in different formats each
week)
|
Weekly; see calendar for
dates marked "RG" |
- A resource
unit* for about 15 days of class time
(20%) WTS 1, 3, 4, 7, 8
|
|
- In-class/online writing assignments pertinent to
professional portfolio (10%)
a. Draft of professional
development goals (in class) b. Draft
"reflective narrative" (online) c. Draft "philosophical
statement" (online) WTS 9 |
Philosophy draft
(submit electronically); Portfolio due first
day of class after end of field study* |
- Portfolio conferences and presentation
(5%)
WTS 6, 9 (counts as final exam)
|
(On scheduled final exam date) |
*Criteria for distinguishing graduate-level work:
Content: When preparing sample short- and
long-term instructional plans for hypothetical settings as undergraduate
students do, graduate students will support their choices explicitly with
reference to specific authorities in the literature, as explained in a
scoring guide to be developed.
Intensity: Graduate students will prepare more detailed
reports in preparation for the weekly reading assignments.
Self-direction: Students all choose the readings for
discussion in class, the topics for their plans, the content of their
presentations, the format of their plans, and their educational
philosophies. They all participate in writing conferences in which
they may choose what to emphasize. Students all receive individualized
feedback on assignments, following formal procedures in which they initiate
the contact and propose ideas and do not have their course of action
prescribed. Therefore the maximum amount of self-direction is
embedded in the course for all students. Differentiating the graduate
students on this dimension would necessitate reducing the self-direction for
undergraduate students and therefore would deprive the undergraduates of a
valuable learning experience.
|
Return
to Methods main page
Back to top
 |
John Zbikowski,
Department of Curriculum and Instruction
Comments on this web page? Email
zbikowsj@mail.uww.edu
Last
updated September 13, 2005 HTTP://facstaff.uww.edu/zbikowsj/gradreq.htm |
|
|