Sudiyanti Sudiyanti
We believe that there is a greater impact of UW-Whitewater population's input demand or consumption on number of generated carbon footprint within the campus area. In our case, the population refers to UW-Whitewater students and enrollments.
Moved by above ideas, we then adopted the principle of Bill of Material approach and employed Forecasting method. What, why and how we utilized these techniques are explained in the next sections.
Bill of Material is an approach that listing the items, ingredients, or materials needed to produce a parent item, end item, or product (Tersine, 1994). The Bill of Material can be structured (1) as simple parts list, (2) to specify how product is generated, or (3) to simplify forecasting and master scheduling. This approach is also called as the product structure when it indicates how a product will be produced. The specific format for the Bill of Material depends upon its intended use. Some of its important uses are to (1) define the product and distinguish it from other products; (2) facilitate the forecasting of optional product features; (3) permit the master schedule to be stated in terms of the fewest possible end items; (4) allow easy order entry from customers; (5) provide the basis for product costing; (6) facilitate material procurement; (7) aid manufacturing planning and final assembly scheduling; and (8) permit efficient file storage and maintenance. Bill of Material can be structured to provide information by either tracing down (exploding) or tracing up (imploding) a product structure. Explosion begins with the parent and breaks it into its lower level components; implosion begins with the component and builds into the parent or higher-level items. The explosion of end item requirements or master scheduled items into component requirements is vital for MRP to establish all lower level component scheduling (Tersine, 1994). Hence, the usability of Bill of Material is important for MRP. MRP approach and its application in Greening Whitewater project are explained in the separate report.
Forecasting is a method used for translating precedent experience into estimates of the future. A comprehensive definition describes that forecasting is the prediction of values of a variable based on known past values of that variable or other related variables, expert judgments, which in turn based on historical data and experience (Makridakis, Wheelwright, & McGee, Forecasting: Methods and Applications, 1983).
There are several methods in forecasting, which can be categorized into:
Most organizations either make to stock, so that all planning is based on forecasts, or use customer orders in the short range and forecasts to fill out the remainder of the planning horizon. Some specific Bill of Material is needed to link the master schedule to its dependent components that have to be obtained prior to receiving the customer orders. Thus, planning bills perform this function and substantially reduce the number of items to be forecasted and master scheduled (Tersine, 1994).
Supply chain management decisions are based on forecasts that define which products will be required, what amount of these products will be called for, and when they will be needed. The demand forecast becomes the basis for companies to plan their internal operations and cooperate among each other to meet market demand. By forecasting, it can help the UWW to predict when the demand of, for instance papers will increase? How much papers are needed in a right time?
Achieving effective procurement is begun with an understanding of how much of what categories of products are being bought across the entire organization as well as by each operating unit. This refers to the consideration of how much of what kinds of products are bought from whom and at what prices (Hugos, 2003). Thus, the need of forecasting is important in these matters. The use of forecasting in this project is aimed to identify and predict the unit consumption (input) of UW-Whitewater students and enrollments in order to estimate the carbon footprint. Another purpose is to get better understanding of the usefulness of forecasting methods in supply chain management and business knowledge.
Moving Average is also known as Weighted Moving Average. Some of its characteristics are (1) very simple method for time series forecasting, (2) before any forecast can be prepared, we must have as many historical observations as are needed for the moving average, (3) the greater number of observations included in the moving average, the greater smoothing effect on the forecast (Makridakis & Wheelwright, 1989). Moreover, there are two types of moving average can be applied: 1) the three-month and the five-month moving average. Which moving average would be more appropriate, the three-month or the five-month? In the next section, we will find the detail explanation for this.
Inherent in the collection of data taken over time is some form of
random variation. There exist methods for reducing of canceling the
effect due to random variation. An often-used technique in industry
is ``smoothing''. This technique, when properly applied, reveals
more clearly the underlying trend, seasonal and cyclic components.
Equation 1 shows the formula of Moving Average, where
the multiplier
is called the weight and they
sum to 1.
The major strength of Moving Average is that this method is well suited to situations for products with fairly stable purchasing data. Unfortunately, it does have some of drawbacks; such as the requirement of a large amount of historical data and it assign equal weight to each period.
Exponential smoothing methods overcome both of drawbacks of Moving Average models. This is a very popular scheme to produce a smoothed Time Series. Whereas in Single Moving Averages the past observations are weighted equally, Exponential Smoothing assigns exponentially decreasing weights as the observation get older. In the case of moving averages, the weights assigned to the observations are the same and are equal to 1/N. In exponential smoothing, however, there are one or more smoothing parameters to be determined (or estimated) and these choices determine the weights assigned to the observations.
The basic premise of exponential smoothing is that the data values for more recent periods have more impact on the forecast and therefore should be given more weight. The goal is to distinguish between the random fluctuations and the basic underlying pattern by ``smoothing'' the historical values. The selection of the technique depends on the forecaster. If it is desired to portray the growth process in a more aggressive manner, then one selects double smoothing.
The smoothing scheme begins by setting S2 to y1, where ... stands for smoothed observation, and y stands for the original observation. The subscripts refer to the time periods, 1, 2, ..., n. For the third period: S3 = αy2 + (1 - α)S2; and so on. There is no S1; the smoothed series starts with the smoothed version of the second observation. For any time period t, the smoothed value St is found by computing:
This is the basic equation of single exponential smoothing and the constant or parameter α, is called the smoothing constant. The speed at which the older responses are dampened (smoothed) is a function of the value of α. When α is close to 1, dampening is quick and when α is close to 0, dampening is slow. The lower α is the smoother result. We use trial-and-error method to select the α value from 0.1 to 0.9. The LGR LGRa value was selected based on the lowest MSE value. In the case, we take an α value of 0.65.
Single Smoothing does not excel in following the data when there is a trend. This situation can be improved by the introduction of a second equation with a second constant, γ, which must be chosen in conjunction with α. Here are the two equations associated with Double Exponential Smoothing:
As in the case for single smoothing, there are a variety of schemes to set initial values for St and bt in double smoothing. St is in general set to y1. The b1 is calculating by the following technique:
The first smoothing equation adjusts St directly for the trend of the previous period, bt-1, by adding it to the last smoothed value, St-1. This helps to eliminate the lag and brings St to the appropriate base of the current value. The second smoothing equation then updates the trend, which is expressed as the difference between the last two values. The equation is similar to the basic form of single smoothing, but here applied to the updating of the trend. We have also used trial-and-error method to determine the α and γ values. The one-period-ahead forecast is given by:
Simple regression is a statistical technique for measuring the relationship between a dependent variable and one independent variable (Kress, 1985). In this method, only a straight line (linear) is used as a regression line in describing the shape of the average relationship between two variables. The straight line can be expressed by the linear equation:
The best way to obtain the linear equation from a series of data is to use the method of least squares regression analysis. The equation derived by this method will have a regression line, which will give the best fit to the data (observed data). The least squares method for calculating the a and b values can be drawn as follows:
The strengths of simple regression method are that it is available in most software and inexpensive. Moreover, it provides accurate short and medium-term forecasts, as well as statistical test and confidence interval. In spite of these, some of drawbacks may be found such as the accuracy depends on a consistent relationship between independent and dependent variables, and also user needs to understand all the tests of significance to prevent an inappropriate model from being used (Makridakis & Wheelwright, 1989). We do not encourage do the lagged regression forecasting manually, unless one rests on a certain software to support in calculating. Please go to the illustration of Lagged Regression in Greening Whitewater Forecasting Demand to see the detail processes of its calculation.
In this project, we applied the convenience sampling method to select the respondents. This technique is the simplest one that involves selecting sample elements that are most readily available to participate in the study and who can provide the information required (Hair, et al, 2003). The sample of this project consists of 5 categories:
Data aggregation level is constituted on semester basis. The using of this approach is aimed as we suspect that there may be difference between the spring and autumn semester in term of number of students.
We applied the concept of the traditional Bill of Material to trace the output structure down.
Figure 1 illustrates how we break the output down. Suppose one building, in our figure is depicted by Carlson building, may have population category of consumers such as students, departments, staffs, administrative officers, and faculty enrollments. Obviously, each category is the main contributor of outputs. In Carlson building, a local student for instance, consumes A, B, and C products. Here, we call A, B, and C as the mother products. Subsequently, each product will be broken down into pieces of compositions of α, β, γ, and δ. The information we generate in this stage will facilitate the MRP system to determine the carbon footprint generated by its mother product.
We realize that there must be some limitations of using above approaches. Therefore, we rest on the following assumptions:
We used questionnaire in collecting primary data from the students. This tool was designed to find out what are the students' daily consumptions in terms of food and beverage packages, papers, transportation, and other related stuffs, which they used and consumed in the particular building. In our research, we focus on Carlson building only. It is also helpful on identifying the difference of commuter and local students' consumption pattern. For this purposes, we involved 38 students as the respondents, which are composed of 12 commuter and 26 local students. We asked the students to trace their consumption on a daily basis during 1 week.
By assuming that if a student's 1-week consumption is repetitive pattern and 1 semester has 16 weeks (4 weeks multiply by 4 months), subsequently we can calculate his or her consumption on semester basis. It is acquired by applying this following formula:
Equation (10), C denotes student consumption on item ``i'', while ``s'' is for semester and ``w is for weekly basis. For instance, suppose that averagely a student consumes 12 sheets in a week (Ci,w). We can compute that she or he consumes 192 sheets in 1 semester (12 sheets × 16 = 192 sheets). Moreover, the similar method goes for other items.
Meanwhile, we also interviewed staffs and faculty members, consumption data from department and administrative office were acquired by investigating the purchase files. These secondary data provide purchasing records of each office, which helped us in determining the consumption of office supplies. The good thing from this secondary data is that they have a very good record on each item purchased in the monthly and semester basis. Equation (11) demonstrates the formula we used to computing the consumption of enrollments.
The enrollment consumption on item ``i'' is denoted by C, while ``s'' is for semester and ``m'' is for monthly basis. For instance, suppose that averagely an enrollment purchases 2 reams of copy papers in a month (Ci,m). We can compute that she or he purchases 8 reams in 1 semester (2 reams × 4 = 8 reams), this method similarly goes for other items.
Figure 2 exemplifies the breakdown of local student's consumption output on food and beverage (B&F). On the specific words, a local student for instance, consumes foods and beverages, which then they will be broken down into pieces of compositions of paper box, can, plastic bottle, and plastic bag. The information we generate in this phase will aid the MRP system to determine the carbon footprint generated by paper box, can, plastic bottle, and plastic bag. Please visit the Bill of Material link for its detail computations.
Suppose in one semester, one person has the number of generated output
for item ``i'' as
, thus, we can calculate the total number of each
category's generated output (
) by multiplying the number of generated
output (
) per semester by the number of population within
each category (n). Equation (12) shows the
formula for computing the total number of each category's
generated output.
For example, in average, a local student consumes 112 plastic bottle of soda (item ``i'') per semester and we have 3,000 local students in Carlson, subsequently this category will have 3,000 × 112 = 336,000 plastic bottles output within one semester.
We provide the illustration of forecasting methods implementation for this project. Please refer to the Greening Whitewater Forecasting Demand link to see the calculation approaches were used. For overall of Moving Average and Exponential, the accuracy of the forecasting methods indicates a good or bad estimation. The accuracy will depend on the error. The thumb of rules for these indications of error explain that the smaller value of error, the better result of forecasting.
|
Figure 3 shows the illustration of paper consumption forecast per commuter student on 3-semester basis compared to the 5-semester moving average. If compare the error of using 3-semester that gives us total error of 5 and mean of error = 1, and 5-semester moving average forecasting method that provides total error of -1.4 and mean of error = -0.175, thus, we can conclude that the 5-semester moving average forecasting method shows the more accuracy result than the 3-semester basis. Therefore, we recommend that this project should apply the 5-semester moving average forecasting for further research.
The major strength of Moving Average is that this method is well suited to situations for products with fairly stable observed data such as monthly purchasing or monthly consumptions. Consequently, it requires a large amount of historical data.
|
The similar approach goes to both single and double exponential forecasting methods. Figure 4 shows the implication of using single and double exponential for predicting commuter student's paper consumption based on semester data observation. Single exponential gives us 52 total error, while the double exponential the lower number of error -94. If we go back to the thumb of rules that rest on the deviation between observed data and forecast data we got (or error), we can say that error in using Single Exponential is larger than what we have in Double Exponential. Other words, the better result is shown by Double Exponential forecasting. For this reason, we subsequently recommend to use Double Exponential forecasting in for further research.
The exponential method is used to overcome some of drawbacks in Moving Average systems. Accordingly, the more benefits and advantages can be obtained by using exponential than the moving overage in term of implementation and data availability.
The basic premise of a causal model like Simple Regression is that changes in the value of a certain variable (number of student, for instance) are closely associated with changes in the other one variable (in our case it is number of paper consumption).
|
Figure 5 illustrates how we can obtain a (a = 121.8) and b (b = 1.8) in order to develop regression model for paper consumption forecast. Given a and b, we can predict how much paper had been consumed per semester (Forecast or Ye) if the number of students (X) changes. Please refer to the Greening Whitewater Forecasting Demand link to see the relevant and comprehensive computations of this technique.
This report deserves comments due to its limitations. Prior to conduct the sampling process, it is essential to define how we determine the sample size. Roscoe (Sekaran, 2003) proposes the following rules of thumb for determining sample size:
Further research needs starting with open-ended questions regarding what items are consumed in campus and in which building. Hence, a more comprehensive research should be done. Another thing is the importance of using the same respondent in computing the time series forecasting also may help to increase the reliability of the research. One other recommendation also came up to our mind is the usability of UW-Whitewater's information system in providing required information such as how many papers are printed during one semester by one student. Tracking each time one student logs in into the UW-Whitewater system and prints is a way to implement this suggestion.
This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2002-2-1 (1.70)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -no_subdir -split 0 -show_section_numbers Greening_Whitewater_Project_Report_INPUT.tex
The translation was initiated by Sudiyanti on 2008-12-11