Why Americans should oppose mandatory
high school "drug" tests for cigarettes
WASHINGTON, DC -- A decision by an Alabama high school to
start doing "drug" tests on student athletes to detect cigarette
smoking -- a policy other schools around the USA are expected
to emulate soon -- shows that mandatory drug testing has
gotten out of hand, the Libertarian Party says.
"Even if you think teenagers and cigarettes don't mix,
subjecting students to mandatory blood tests to discourage
smoking is a drastic overreaction to the problem," said the
party's national director, Steve Dasbach.
"And given the poor performance of so many students, you can
make the case that public schools should be scheduling more
tests in math, English, and history -- and fewer tests for
cigarette smoking."
This semester, Hoover High School in Hoover, Alabama
announced it would begin a program of mandatory, random
blood tests of the 1,500 students in grades 7 to 12 who
participate in school athletic programs. Students can be tested
for 11 illegal drugs and alcohol -- and also for nicotine from
cigarettes and chewing tobacco.
Arguing that nicotine is a "mind-altering" substance, school
officials said athletes who test positive will be subject to
parental notification, mandatory tobacco education classes, and
then suspension from athletic events.
Anti-tobacco advocates predicted the program would quickly
spread to other government schools around the country.
Before it does, Americans should consider whether they really
want to escalate the federal government's unsuccessful "War on
Teenage Smoking" in this fashion, said Dasbach.
"So far, the only result of Washington, DC's decade-long crusade
against teenage smoking has been more teenage smoking," he
noted. "Between 1991 and 1997, smoking rates among high
school students increased by almost one-third, from 27.5% to
36.4%.
"Teenage smoking rates have dipped slightly in the last year,
but you can make the case that the more politicians huff and
puff about the evils of smoking, the more they tempt rebellious
teenagers to take up the habit. Why should this program be
different?"
Mandatory nicotine testing also blurs the distinction between
the dangers posed to teenagers by cigarettes versus the dangers
from drugs and alcohol, said Dasbach.
"While no one argues that in a perfect world, teenagers wouldn't
smoke, the idea that students should be drug-tested for a bad
habit that might cause illness or premature death in 50 years is
absurd," he said.
"More importantly, nicotine testing also deflects parents'
attention away from the more immediate dangers posed to
teenagers by alcohol and many illegal drugs. Surely, no sensible
person thinks that teenagers who smoke and drive are as much
at risk as teenagers who drink and drive."
Finally, mandatory blood tests for teenagers send a chilling
message to young people that they can be tested "like laboratory
animals" any time the government wants, said Dasbach.
"It would be nice if government schools taught students about
the Fourth Amendment -- which guarantees the right to be free
from unreasonable, warrantless searches -- instead of
subjecting students to unreasonable, warrantless blood testing,"
he said. "After all, a government powerful enough to mandate
blood tests for nicotine poses a greater danger to the long-term
well-being of American teenagers than puffing on a cigarette
ever will."