Government Censorship: Indecency and National Security  j

Continuation of the conflict between a media industry that is driven by different demands and the need to create  an informed public which is precondition for responsive/active citizen presence in government.

tonight: government regulation/censorship and its impact on "marketplace of ideas"
need for openness and transparency in government procedures
Sunshine Week, currently. open govt to media scrutiny- public right to know

Review:
 --transformation into mediated politics with focus on images and symbolism
--incompatible to have profit-driven media companies be the primary source of information necessary for informed democracy
--since private enterprise, ratings determine content, not what is necessary to have educated citizenry

    When citizens not informed, like "deaf spectators in back row of sports event"
     "citizens are given what they want and not what they need".

what happens when we add the internet into the mix? ex

A. Government regulation- 3 forms
  1. censoring of content (indecency)
  2. censoring of mediums of communication
       a. blogs
       b. satellite radio/tv, cable tv
3. lack of transparency & increased secrecy
      a. is the public getting what they need to make informed decisions?
      b. do we get info necessary to hold officials accountable?

 Censorship of Content:

B. history of regulation:
      1. 1934, first legislation  from Federal Communications Commission
          a. provided free licenses to public airwaves to private companies
          b. stations providing public service to citizens w/ information in exchange
    
 2. government represented "public trust"
         a. indecency has been redefined over different eras based on community standards (not obscenity)
         b. radio gets less first amendment protection than books, newspapers

   3. 1930's:  "by god", damned, "Bloomersville"

obscenity defined as: "any language patently offensive by contemporary community standards and wholly without redeeming social value." (1970)  ob vs ind

(1975): no longer required to have "redeeming social value"
      a.  restrict times in which children would be watching  (after 10 pm)
      b. indecency defined as: content which described sexual or excretory activities or organs in a manner that was "patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium."
 
(1978)  FCC vs Pacifica,  (7 dirty words-George Carlin ex)
down to 6  Golden Globes 2003.

The FCC's actual judgment said the most versatile four-letter word in the English language "may be crude and offensive, but, in the context (used by Bono), did not describe sexual or excretory organs or activities." (reversed later)

1987- FCC, would prohibit any broadcast it considered "patently offensive," regardless of specific language or redeeming social value.

1997: Reno v. ACLU, struck down the "Communications Decency Act."
-internet could not be censored in the same way as radio/television  because too difficult (hard for servers to regulate what sites adult users seek)

2001:  FCC  found "indecent" Sarah Jones's Your Revolution.
      -Language was "patently offensive" and "designed to pander and shock."  lyrics
        (overturned in 2003)

2004, Superbowl "wardrobe malfunction"  FCC
    a. public outcry of complaints 
       1. effect of consolidation- MTV & CBS in same conglomerate- different values
       2. congressional bipartisan coalition to crack down
   b. fines increased from $27,500 for single incident, to $500,000, potentially
        1. 'shock jocks' first to go- Howard Stern
        2. $771, 000 fine to Bubba the Love Sponge
         a.  now on satellite/internet
  Save Howard     Bubba, the Love Sponge
 
   c. impact on radio decisions about what could be broadcast
          1. "Saving Private Ryan" not shown on 66 ABC affiliates on Veteran's Day, 2004
              a. fear of profanity, indecency fine (put them out of business)
          2. "Soldiers in Iraq" FRONTLINE episode
             a. many stations concerned about liability if fined- "War is Heck" version
         3. PBS documentary on Blues, narrated by Martin Scorcese- profanity prevented airing by many affiliate

   d. Indecency censorship of all forms of media currently issue to be decided
   
   
1. expand indecency regulation to cable, satellite tv
       a. same standards for all mediums is plan
       b. concern is for children having access to cable/satellite broadcasts
       c. primary target is "South Park"

  e. Three concerns
      1. Is this policy unevenly applied? 
hs  ow
       2.
Does the fear of 'indecency" limit artistic expression and metaphor?
      3. Does obscenity regulations also limiting political speech?
           a. relevant  in era in which politics/culture is merged
           b.  hypocrisy of position
                1. attracted to indecency, even if we find it repugnant
                2. good for ratings
        4. case before Supreme court- "Bong Hits for Jesus"
            a. was freedom of expression of HS student violated by principal in this case?
            b. looked at as form of political speech 

     5. Platteville, WI homeowner- 05/04- sign when Bush came through:   "FU GW"  ex
          a. fined, later reversed
          b. non-Bush supporters banned from crowd, more serious

Censorship of explicitly political speech is more limited
  a. long history of  court decisions favor freedom of expression
  b. bigger concern raised that those w/ unpopular politics get cancelled
     1. ex. Bill Maher cancelled after 9/11- "said terrorists were very committed and smart"
     2. Crossfire, Tucker Carlson cancelled after Jon Stewart appearance

c. other response is pundits can say whatever they want, if ratings are good
   1. ex. Keith Olberman, MSNBC, Rush Limbaugh
   2. Ann Coulter, Bill Maher, Rosie O'Donnell- shock value
      a. concern about irresponsible rhetoric
      b. not modelling ideal political discourse

d. concern that all viewpoints not represented
   1. "Fairness doctrine"

e. some concern that newspapers pressured to not print stories by government
   1. NYTIMES held domestic spying story till after 2004 election
   2. reporters kept in jail for not revealing sources

f. internet censorship currently lesss
    1. concern that sites could be blocked because of political content

Censorship of Internet 
blocking
        
2. concern that candidate views might be blocked   candidates blocked

f. concern that national security prevents airing of information that is not really security risk
    1. ex. no photgraphing of coffins returning- respect for deceased or 'impression' management?
        a. major change of coverage of war than any other combat situation
        b. also, more focus on destruction than on construction (ratings)

    2. post-9/11 effect
       a. time to have national conversation about what proper balance should be
       b. concern is that all protest viewed as unpatriotic

C. 3rd issue-  failure of government to release information to citizens
    1. lack of transparency and openness makes it difficult to make informed decisions
      a. increase in denial of FOIA requests since 9/11
      b. leads to lack of trust in govt by citizens- belief that all are corrupt

  2. Sunshine Week highlights these concerns
    a. where/who is campaign money coming from?  Does it affect policy decisions?
    b. How is government using laws passed? Is there abuse of power?
    c. Is what they say what they are doing?
       1. ex. Patriot Act violations by FBI
       2. firing of federal attorneys  Why?
   d. constitutional showdown between executive branch and congress
      1. can administration officials be subpoened, made to testify under oath in front of congress?
       2. High Noon scenario

a. lack of transparency
     1. security concerns
     2. operating style
b. informed decisions more difficult w/o info
   1. Sunshine Week legislation  Sunshine Week