Political
Persuasion and Political Campaigns
Snow, Nancy. 2005. Ten Things Everyone
Should
Know About Propaganda
Sanes, Ken. 2000. Faking It
tonight:
changes in the way that political leaders
communicate with public for support
--public approval and
campaigns/spin
--persuasion &
leadership vs. manipulation/propaganda campaigns
I.
ties together many themes we've covered
a. importance of constructed
image for persuasion
b. merging of
culture/politics
c. type of media
coverage (sound
bites)
d. lack of
info-diversity
e. how the public can be engaged- through conversations,
or
by spectacle
f. growing role of the internet
Central
concerns:
---Given
possibilities of 'simulation & manipulation' available, to what
extent
are citizens making 'informed decisions' with full consideration of all
the
information?
---Is the use of propaganda/simulation compatible
with participatory
democracy?
II.
Political
leadership now dependent upon ability to communicate, to persuade public
A. Teddy Roosevelt, presidency
is "the bully
pulpit"
1. always a
source of leverage
for presidents
a.
ability to create political "vision"
& sway public
b.
bring public
pressure to bear against on other institutions to change
B.
Leadership often
exercised through rhetorical skill, speeches
1. ability to crystallize policy initiatives into compelling
metaphor/symbol
2. create public
consensus around path of action
a. example: FDR "Day Of Infamy" speech FDR
b.
Kennedy/Reagan
Reagan
3. damage
control- Nixon's"Checkers"
speech excerpt
a. persuasive
power of images,
symbols
b. "everyman"
image developed
4. political theatre skills
necessary for office
C.
media skills now more important than earlier eras
1. nature
of political
coverage more personalized, truncated
a. televised
events
primary way public knows/judges prez
b. focus
on leader as symbol of
government
2.
weakening of traditional
institutional affiliations
a. political parties, unions, civil society
b. more voters vote for who they
'trust'/'like'
the best turkey
3. unpopular policies
forgiven if
personally popular
a.
"teflon"
factor
b.
contradictions
in policy never explored
c. if
unpopular, everything is scrutinized mercilessly
E.
propaganda techniques used increasingly
1.
persuade ppl to
support- either by words or image
2. aim of electoral campaigns,
in particular
Harold Lasswell: "Not bombs nor bread, but words, pictures, songs, parades, and many similar devices are the typical means of making propaganda. Propaganda relies on symbols to attain its end: the manipulation of collective attitudes. The detailed suffering of a little girl and her kitten can motivate our hatred against the Germans, arouse our sympathy for Armenians, make us enthusiastic for the Red Cross, or lead us to give money for a home for cats."
B. techniques of propaganda
increasingly more relevant to campaigns ex
1. defn:
repetition of simplified message, designed for mass persuasion
a. emotional appeals, short-circuit logical cognitive processes
b. "scape-goating", "name-calling, "glittering generalities"
c. persuasion by
association, (negative & positive values)
2. American origin- WWI,
Committee for Public Information
a. mass persuasion to bolster public support for war effort
kaiser
1. create image of "evil Hun" in minds of public
a. "demonizing" enemy
b arousal of fear, anger, cultural distance
2. anti-German backlash against german culture
a. lynching of Robert Praeger 1917
b. end to bi-lingual schools, Turner societies, sauerkraut ex
b. also used in World War II by both sides gp german
propaganda
c. used in Cold War era by both sides Soviet ducknCover
1. Joe McCarthy capitalized on this
a. black-listing of artists, "sympathizers" ex
b. "red-baiting" to maintain power
d. used by fed
govt now to persuade
ppl to not use drugs, cigarettes
1. Hamas h
anti-jewish
bsh
3. w/ professionalization of campaigns,
more germane
a.
marketing techniques
used to develop sellable political "product"
1. focus groups, polling, etc.
a. determine issues most important to public
b. design campaigns to capitalize on them
2. "spin" doctors
deflect attacks, bolster candidate image
a. less unscripted appearances
b. consultant-driven strategies
3.
creation of ads to persuade public to "buy" candidate
a. narrative
appeal more than issue-based
1. montage of images, associations,
2. emotional cues, values, create impression
3. text is 30 second "sound bite", reinforces image
4. short-circuits cognition (logic-based)
c. polished
techniques used to create emotional reaction
1.
morphing into
unpopular character example
2.
music, lighting,
camera angle all designed for effect Example
of construction of political ad
3. candidates are
marketed to public as symbol
a. adds to cost of campaigns
b. diminishes possibility of national conversation of competing visions
1. low opinion of public judgment
2. elections are not educative/but political spectacles
d. power of political ads should not
be underestimated
1.especially, for "undecideds"
2. negative
ads ng
a. most believed by public
b. most disliked by public
3. powerful ads that
influenced elections
a. DAISY
ad, 1964
b.
Willy
Horton, 1988
4. propaganda techniques used
a. visual component of danger
b. uses fear, threat associated w/ opponent lr
5. positive symbol association,
also
a. Morning
in America, 1984
b.
reassurance, associated w/ candidate
c.
visual is message, no policy details, just mood
6. campaign 2008 ads continued trend
a.
candidates' use of musicians, endorsements
b. image has become key , what
stuck? issues
a. counter-images released, ex. Palin
b. contending images, but not issues
Problems:
Is the use of propaganda compatible with
participatory democracy?
Doesn't it undermine the ability to think
critically?
A.
democratic theory
1. every citizen should have
equality of political influence image
a. participatory
v. elite vary on how exercised
2. separation between market and
polis (public square)
a. economic inequality
in market economy
b. public deliberation
in public square
1.
equality of influence for all citizens
2.
decisions made on basis of reasoned argument
3.contrast between "rules" of market/political domain
a. political characterized by debate,
talk, deliberation among equals
b. market based on economic competition
(wealth advantaged over poor)
1. those with more
money, get to talk louder
2. money guarantees
access to insiders, not guaranteed results
B. historically and empirically, money & politics always
united
1. reform occurs only when problem
reaches
crisis proportions
a. deep-seated public
disgust w/ corruption of system.
b. overhaul of
existing system
c. then, gradual
deterioration & loopholes discovered
2. corruption
of McKinley era (1901)
a. Teddy Roosevelt, the "trust
buster" to institute change
b. 1907 Tillman Act,
corporations cannot contribute money to campaigns
c. progressive era reforms
("Fighting Bob" LaFollette)
3. 1974--post-Watergate
a. public outrage at slush funds,
campaign
corruption
b. put teeth into 1971 Federal Election
Campaign Act
1. provisions:
a.limits on
individual
contributions
b. limits on PAC
contributions (political action committees)
c. public matching
funds w/ voluntary spending limits
d. Federal Election
Commission established to regulate it
c. began to weaken with (1976) Buckley vs Valeo
1. money =political speech
2. given first amendment protections
a. could limit contributions,
but not expenditures of candidate
b. no limits on use of
personal wealth (Herb Kohl, Mitt Romney)
d.
further weakened w/ 1979 amendment to FECA
1.creation of "soft money" for party-building
activities
a. allows for unlimited
funds donated to political parties
1.parties had weakened vs. interest groups (PACS)
2.parties broader institutions to organize public action
b. concern that reform had hurt
parties, by focusing money on candidates
2. "soft money" use increased exponentially since 1988
a. cannot directly be given to
candidate,
but indirect support allowed
b. independent expenditure ads
sponsored
by parties
1."express
advocacy" vs "issue advocacy"
2."magic words"
test (Buckley v Valeo footnote)
3.not
considered "electioneering"
3.
more soft money in 2004 election than ever before
a. 1988, $45 million, 2000, $500 million,
2004 $528mil chart
a. both major parties, rough parity 527
b. increase in independent expenditure ads
from 1996
1. harsher in tone than
candidate-sponsored ads
2. more likely to be negative
3. empirically, same effect
c. stealth ads--no one takes responsibility (527's) org
1. most infamous, "Swiftboat" ads of 2004
2. both republican
& Democratic candidates are targeted, 527's come from all ideologies
4. Results
a. candidates spend more and more time raising
money
1. campaigns never end
2. must interfere w/
policy-making
b. we judge 'electability' of candidates based
on how much they raise. not ideas
b. public is saturated w/ ads
1. closer to propaganda than
"culture of conversation"
2. citizen considered
"consumer"
a.
communication is in 30 second soundbites--one way
b. no
public discussion, more manipulation
5. campaign 2008 will continue the trend
a. candidates' fundraising is
beyond any past elections os
b. advocacy groups already
involved
c. stealth ads
already beginning
d. contributors get increased access to candidates
Political Money Line
1. violates "equality of
influence" for all citizens assumption
2. contributes to lessened
civic presence
Solutions:
a. media literacy encouraged
1. cynicism can
be sign of sophistication
2. alternative
sources of info
a. best response to propaganda is alternative information
b. fighting
the trend
b. Regulate political ads
1. more legible
disclosure statements
2. outlaw issue
advocacy ads
3. make clear who is
buying ad
a. would this be enough?
b. Wisconsin supreme court
race, Judicial Independence Project
c. free debates on network tv
1.five minutes of issue
coverage, exchange for license to airwaves
2. "culture of
conversation" encouraged
3. mini-debates encouraged