Teaching and Research Interests
Teaching: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Organizational Design, Ethics and Social Responsibility, International Management.
Research
Interests: Learning and learning
assessment, Cross-cultural values, Skill transfer for mciro-entrepreneurs, Individual values
and ethics related decisions
Teaching Philosophy
I teach experientially in the broadest sense of the
word. I teach skills and thinking
skills. I do not believe people learn from someone else’s presentation but
they learn from their own thinking and doing.
Therefore in many of my courses, students are asked to spend large
amounts of time, energy, and thought learning by doing, deciding, analyzing,
and thinking. They are asked to spend
little remembering what I say and feeding it back to me in the form of tests. I do not give
multiple-choice tests.
That’s not the way people are assessed in the real world.
Behavior Courses. In my behavior courses, I require students to be in ongoing groups or teams,
undertake graded projects as a team just as they would do in departments in
organizations. Individuals then will need to make
choices about how much to participate and in what direction to influence, and their grades will depend in part how much
they understand the causes and consequences of their choices. They will also be graded on the quality of
analysis of how the group turned out as it did.
I also ask students to analyze cases in my behavior classes
Core Strategy Classes. In both my capstone strategy courses (one
graduate and one undergraduate), I ask students
to play a computerized total enterprise simulation. In the simulation, students run a business
making multiple marketing, operations, and finance decisions (such as how much
to produce, how much to spend on quality improvements, how much to borrow, what
kind of marketing research to do). Grades
depend in part on how much money players make and in part on how well they
understand why they did as well or poorly on the game. . I also ask students to analyze cases in my
strategy classes.
Strategic Theory, Organizational Design, Social Responsibility Classes. In the
majority of my non-behavior, non-simulation classes, I
teach from primary sources (articles and cases); I do not use a text took. Text-books
describe, and I do not want students to remember descriptions. My goal is for students to think, and the
sources I use provoke learners to analyze, apply, and form opinions rather than
just to take in information. Most of the
material I assign is aimed at business practitioners rather than academics, so
it is not highly theoretical. I intend
this material to be recently developed and often controversial. I ask students
try to understand how the article applies in the real world and how valuable it
is. I don’t require them to agree with
the intent of the articles.
Participation. I believe that my responsibility in a classroom is to
develop a structure for learning and to provide materials to stimulate. I also
believe that the instructor is in part responsible for classroom atmosphere in
that he or she should help stimulate and be encouraging and open rather than
critical. I believe that some of the
responsibility for the atmosphere of the classroom, however, belongs to
students. I want students to be open and willing to share experiences and
opinions and prepare enough to understand assigned material. Therefore, I grade
participation. I try not to penalize
naturally shy people, though. I allow
students to turn in papers to prove they have prepared for class.